<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>keene software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://keenesoftware.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://keenesoftware.com</link>
	<description>Random thoughts on software, guitar and lighting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:00:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GearGawker Launch</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2012/08/12/geargawker-launch/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2012/08/12/geargawker-launch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2012 18:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guitars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenesoftware.com/?p=79</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is another idea site that just popped to me. It came together very quickly once I had the idea. I spent a few days shopping around for a good site template to build it on, then spent a couple of weekends roughing it out. I launched it about a week ago, had a few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another idea site that just popped to me. It came together very quickly once I had the idea. I spent a few days shopping around for a good site template to build it on, then spent a couple of weekends roughing it out. I launched it about a week ago, had a few friends and strangers give it some shakedown to work through the bugs and I deem it now ready for full on gawking.</p>
<p>So what is <a title="GearGawker" href="http://www.geargawker.com" target="_blank">GearGawker</a>? If you&#8217;re really into guitars, or any other music gear, part of the fun is looking at all the pictures on all the related forums that people post. The downside is once those posts roll off the top page, they are hard to find and rarely seen again. GearGawker is a media savvy version of that experience. It keeps the most popular and recent gear at the top of the list and it is all searchable by tag, which can include model, brand, color, pickup flavor, whatever.</p>
<p>And most importantly, the pictures are huge. The upload process saves the full resolution version then caches and renders the needed sizes. It auto scales and crops as needed to fit the page. And uploading is dead simple&#8230; just drag and drop.</p>
<p>So if you like looking at guitar porn, be it, PRS, Fender, Gibson or somebody else, we hope to make GearGawker the destination. But you gotta upload your gear!</p>
<p>So, get your gawk on and head over to <a title="www.geargawker.com" href="http://www.geargawker.com" target="_blank">www.geargawker.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2012/08/12/geargawker-launch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Moon Lighting</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/24/more-moonlighting/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/24/more-moonlighting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenesoftware.com/?p=64</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s been a while since I posted any more moon lighting pictures.  I recently upgraded the CMH lighting in the front yard to some new LED lighting in a &#8220;cool white&#8221; color.  I really like the results.  I need to take some pics and post those soon. But for now, here&#8217;s a few more pics [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I posted any more moon lighting pictures.  I recently upgraded the CMH lighting in the front yard to some new LED lighting in a &#8220;cool white&#8221; color.  I really like the results.  I need to take some pics and post those soon.<span id="more-64"></span></p>
<p>But for now, here&#8217;s a few more pics from my backyard.</p>
<p><a href='http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/24/more-moonlighting/moon-lighting-002/' title='moon lighting 002'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/moon-lighting-002-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="moon lighting 002" title="moon lighting 002" /></a><br />
<a href='http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/24/more-moonlighting/moon-lighting-007/' title='moon lighting 007'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/moon-lighting-007-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="moon lighting 007" title="moon lighting 007" /></a><br />
<a href='http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/24/more-moonlighting/moon-lighting-008/' title='moon lighting 008'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/moon-lighting-008-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="moon lighting 008" title="moon lighting 008" /></a><br />
<a href='http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/24/more-moonlighting/moon-lighting-010/' title='moon lighting 010'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/moon-lighting-010-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="moon lighting 010" title="moon lighting 010" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/24/more-moonlighting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Migrating BlogEngine.net to WordPress</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/21/migrating-blogengine-net-to-wordpress/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/21/migrating-blogengine-net-to-wordpress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 21:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://keenesoftware.com/?p=60</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been doing some website housecleaning recently and with my company name change, the old keenesoftware.com site just wasn&#8217;t up to par.  The blog on the new company site will just be company related posts, no personal posts.  So I figured I&#8217;d convert this site over to just a personal blog. The existing blog was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been doing some website housecleaning recently and with my company name change, the old <a title="keenesoftware.com" href="http://www.keenesoftware.com">keenesoftware.com</a> site just wasn&#8217;t up to par.  The blog on the new company site will just be company related posts, no personal posts.  So I figured I&#8217;d convert this site over to just a personal blog.<span id="more-60"></span></p>
<p>The existing blog was BlogEngine.net and while that is a capable blog engine, you need some decent css and html design skills (which I am totally devoid of) to make it look nice.  WordPress, on the other hand, with the huge collection of themes that are out there, is easy to make look much better than I am capable of doing on my own.</p>
<p>So, after some googling, I came up with a recipe.  Here&#8217;s the basic steps:</p>
<ol>
<li>Export your BlogEngine.net to BlogML format</li>
<li>Download all of your media (i.e., images, audio files, etc.)</li>
<li>Upload all of your media to your WordPress site.</li>
<li>Install and configure your desired WordPress theme (I am using the awesome Amplify theme (<a title="Amplify" href="http://themeforest.net/item/amplify-premium-business-blogging-portfolio/144264" target="_blank">http://themeforest.net/item/amplify-premium-business-blogging-portfolio/144264</a>)</li>
<li>Open up the Blog XML file and update the references to your images based on the external urls (ie, not file relative urls but http relative urls).</li>
<li>Update the category names if you want to keep those.</li>
<li>In WordPress, search for and add the BlogML plugin.  There are multiple import plugins available &#8212; you want the BlogML plugin, which isn&#8217;t installed by default.</li>
<li>Import your XML file.</li>
<li>Tweak as needed.</li>
</ol>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 24px;">WordPress is pretty impressive.  But what makes is most impressive is the theme and plugin support that is available.  Building new content driven websites (as opposed to full-blown web applications) is much easier and more cost effective using WordPress than hand coding.  </span></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: small;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="line-height: 24px;">Highly recommended.</span></span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/08/21/migrating-blogengine-net-to-wordpress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grade &#8220;A&#8221; Customer Service</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/07/12/grade-a-customer-service/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/07/12/grade-a-customer-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[16790fd9-cfee-4e70-830a-47f709d0f72a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecb807e3-8744-465a-8d03-1148a88a875a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[customer service]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/Grade-A-Customer-Service.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ask anyone who owns a service business if they know how to provide good customer service and they will all say &#8220;yes.&#8221;  They will offer to send the customer an email with an appointment that can be added to their calendar. They will contact the customer when the service technician is on their way or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask anyone who owns a service business if they know how to provide good customer service and they will all say &#8220;yes.&#8221;  They will offer to send the customer an email with an appointment that can be added to their calendar. They will contact the customer when the service technician is on their way or if they are running late. They will leave a note or work order indicating what service was performed. They might follow up after the service was performed to ensure the customer was happy with the service that was done.  If the service is one that should be done periodically (pest control, air conditioner cleaning), they will contact the customer when it&#8217;s due and try to schedule it.</p>
<p>Now ask them if they actually do all of these things.  Odds are, they probably only do a few of them, and inconsistently at best.  While many service businesses are large enough to have an &#8220;office&#8221; where someone answers the phones, makes appointments and is key to providing customer service, the vast majority of service businesses are run with a cell phone and a somewhat disorganized collection of notes, maps and papers on the dashboard of the truck.  Ask them where their customer list and if you&#8217;re lucky, they will say it&#8217;s in their accounting application.  More than likely, they will point to their dashboard or maybe Excel.  Web applications and ubiquitous iPhone/Android smartphones can bring grade A customer service to even the 1-2 man operation in a very cost effective solution that is easy to use and requires no local installation.</p>
<p>Stay tuned&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2011/07/12/grade-a-customer-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PRS Swamp Ash Special 25th Anniversary with Narrowfield Pickups Review</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/07/18/prs-swamp-ash-special-25th-anniversary-with-narrowfield-pickups-review/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/07/18/prs-swamp-ash-special-25th-anniversary-with-narrowfield-pickups-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guitar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/PRS-Swamp-Ash-Special-25th-Anniversary-with-Narrowfield-Pickups-Review.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is quite possibly the best electric guitar ever.  Seriously.  As in, &#8220;since the dawn of time&#8221; ever.  I have always like Strats.  I even own a Strat.  A lot of my favorite players are (or were) Strat guys.  Guys like Eric Johnson, Stevie Ray Vaughan, Jimi Hendrix, Lincoln Brewster&#8230;  all phenomenal players and all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is quite possibly the best electric guitar ever.  Seriously.  As in, &#8220;since the dawn of time&#8221; ever.  I have always like Strats.  I even own a Strat.  A lot of my favorite players are (or were) Strat guys.  Guys like Eric Johnson, Stevie Ray Vaughan, Jimi Hendrix, Lincoln Brewster&#8230;<span id="more-15"></span>  all phenomenal players and all Strat guys.  They also have a lot more skill than I will ever have on the guitar so they also have great tone.  Tone is more than just the gear &#8212; it&#8217;s how you play, it&#8217;s your phrasing, your attack, your fingers&#8230; everything.  So since I&#8217;ll never be as good as these guys, but I can still hear their tone in my head, my quest to produce that tone through gear is almost never ending.  Until now&#8230;</p>
<p><img src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sasnf-004.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>The Paul Reed Smith Swamp Ash Special model has never really had a strong appeal to me.  It&#8217;s a cool guitar, with a maple neck (which I like) and has decent split coil tones to draw out the Stratness that I like, almost to a fault.  Even though I like Strat tone, I could never get the tone in my head to come out with a Strat or any other single coil/split coil configuration.  So to end my pain, PRS has created a new pickup for the 25th year anniversary models called &#8220;narrowfields.&#8221;  They are basically underwound 57/08s with the pole pieces squeezed closer together so they pick up a &#8220;narrower&#8221; portion of the string as they vibrate.  They are humbuckers so they have no hum (obvious, I know), they have more windings than a single coil so they are hotter output and the tone is extremely Strat-like.  One guy describes them as &#8220;Strat on crack.&#8221;  All I know is they are the epitome of Stratness that I&#8217;ve always heard in my head. The overall tone is &#8220;thicker&#8221; with nice highs like a single coil but better bass response that&#8217;s clear and not muddy like typical humbuckers.</p>
<p>So&#8230; what follows are my thoughts on my 2010 PRS SASNF in Scarlett Smokeburst (aka&#8230; red &#8216;burst).  I&#8217;ve had it about 3 months now and it&#8217;s absolutely my #1 guitar.  I&#8217;ll play others based on what we&#8217;re doing, but for 90% of what we play, this is the guitar I use now.  First up is the case:<br />
<img src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sasnf-002.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>Yeah, it&#8217;s really that white.  I think the 25th anniversary cases look cool and all, but after hauling that along with another guitar, floorboard, etc. to my weekly practice and gig for a couple of weeks resulted in the purchase of a new gig bag and a parking spot on the top of a shelf in the master bedroom closet for the case.  Cases are great protection, but not at the expense of being a dirt magnet and throwing my back out.  I can imagine guys rating the cleanliness of these cases after a few years.</p>
<p>In terms of tone, I figured I&#8217;d just let some sound clips do the talking.  I play 3 different phrases and each phrase is played with the 5-way in each different position, starting at the bridge pickup and going to the neck.  It&#8217;s pretty obvious when I&#8217;m changing the switch.</p>
<p>Clean Sample: </p>
<p>Rhythm Sample: </p>
<p>Lead Sample: </p>
<p>These were all recorded direct into my X3 Live and then into Ableton Live and then converted to 128Kbit MP3s.</p>
<p>The build quality is awesome.  It&#8217;s a bolt on maple neck (like my 24CE, and most Strat style guitars) that has great flame to it.  The knobs are easy to get to and the 5-way is immediately familiar.  As always, PRS finishes are top notch.  While mine is a two piece top, there are quite a few of these out there with 3 piece tops.  As such, there&#8217;s quite a bit of variety.  If you&#8217;re shopping for one of these, and you have to pre-order, make sure you have the option of seeing it before taking delivery to make sure you like the top.</p>
<p><img src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sasnf-005.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>PRS trems are always floating, and do a great job of staying in tune.  But if you&#8217;re used to a Strat&#8217;s non-floating trem setup, this may not be what you&#8217;re looking for.  As with all floating trems, when you do string bends, all the strings will go slightly out of tune so if you&#8217;re bending against open strings (think the open E followed by the bends in the intro of &#8220;Cliffs of Dover&#8221;), it&#8217;s something you have to &#8220;plan for.&#8221;  The good news is these pickups are on a couple of other models (the ME3 and the McNF &#8212; the McCarty narrowfield).  Both of these are stoptail designs and also maple tops instead of swamp ash.  The ME3 would be a nice to have because it&#8217;s got 3 pickups, but the Modern Eagles are always priced at a premium.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sufficiently enamored with the narrowfield pickups that I plan on getting a McCarty Narrowfield as well.  The thicker body and maple top should provide some tonal variety and the stoptail bridge will be nice to have for quick alt tuning changes. Prior to getting this guitar, I was considering getting a 513 or a 305 to fill my desire for PRS constructed Stratness.  Unfortunately for PRS, this one guitar takes care of that for me.  But fortunately for them, I see other narrowfield guitars in my future.</p>
<p>So, in short, if you&#8217;re a Strat guy, you really should try one of these out.  If you can work a deal to get one on approval for a couple of weeks or borrow one, do it.  While this is a 25th anniversary model, I asked PRS himself at this year&#8217;s Dallas International Guitar festival about this model and he said they&#8217;d be continuing this one post 25th.  That good, and also not surprising since I&#8217;m sure it&#8217;s pretty expensive to tool up for a new pickup configuration like these.  It&#8217;s different rings, different routing, the whole deal.  I doubt they&#8217;d go to that effort for one year&#8217;s batch.  Here&#8217;s one last &#8220;art&#8221; shot:</p>
<p><img src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sasnf-006.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping they do some Customs with Narrowfields, kind of like their<br />
soapbar Customs &#8212; 3 pickups, maple top, trem and a wide thin neck<br />
option.  Then I&#8217;ll be done buying guitars.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Yeah, right&#8230;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/07/18/prs-swamp-ash-special-25th-anniversary-with-narrowfield-pickups-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sas-nf-clean.mp3" length="2116546" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sas-nf-lead.mp3" length="762358" type="audio/mpeg" />
<enclosure url="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/sas-nf-rhythm.mp3" length="1947272" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>JamHub Review for In Ear Monitoring</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/02/10/jamhub-review-for-in-ear-monitoring/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/02/10/jamhub-review-for-in-ear-monitoring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6b8162e9-73be-48cb-8507-9f6e5a07fcb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/JamHub-for-In-Ear-Monitoring.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first heard about JamHub (http://www.jamhub.com), my first thought was where was this 30 years ago?  My second thought was: I need to get this for my band. So, what is JamHub?  It&#8217;s a very specialized mixer that was designed to facilitate a band rehearsal without the Marshall half stack and 8&#215;10 Ampeg cabinets.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first heard about JamHub (<a title="JamHub" href="http://www.jamhub.com">http://www.jamhub.com</a>), my first thought was where was this 30 years ago?  My second thought was: I need to get this for my band.</p>
<p>So, what is JamHub?  It&#8217;s a very specialized mixer that was designed to facilitate a band rehearsal without the Marshall half stack and 8&#215;10 Ampeg cabinets.  In any apartment, dorm or even residential community, practicing at any kind of volume is sure to draw attention from neighbors and their friends at the local police precinct.  The basic design is each person has a &#8220;station&#8221; and they plug in their instrument or the line out from their modeling pedals and their mics (through the XLR jacks) in directly.   They then have control over the trim on those two sets of inputs (which sets the maximum volume from their station available to the other stations for listening).  Everyone then has a knob for each station and they can determine the level of themselves and everyone else in their own mix.  Each station has a headphone jack (and an associated volume control there also) to plug in and hear everyone else along with their own instrument and mic.</p>
<p>For this basic problem (the &#8220;silent rehearsal studio&#8221;), the concept works exactly as designed.  It&#8217;s very portable, pretty quick and easy to set up and for even the somewhat technically challenged, it&#8217;s easy to figure out and be productive with pretty quickly. In terms of getting it up and running, probably the hardest thing to get used to is using headphones.  If you&#8217;re used to any kind of &#8220;stage&#8221; volume, switching to an in ear monitor system of any kind is difficult.  You don&#8217;t have the same &#8220;feel&#8221; that you get from the booming speakers.  You also get a slightly isolated feeling because with a good set of ear buds, you&#8217;re not going to hear much ambient noise.  So if everyone stops playing and starts talking, you have to be ready to either give everone mics or everybody starts taking one of the ear buds out to hear.</p>
<p>The other thing that takes some getting used to is adjusting all the different gain stages to get what you want to hear.  The trims on the inputs have an LED that that will show when there&#8217;s signal (green) and when it&#8217;s clipping (red).  In theory, you just dial till you have green while you are playing and dial back if you get red.  This is no biggie when you have a sound guy at a mixing board &#8212; that&#8217;s what he does, especially as different songs result in different vocal styles or playing styles.  You&#8217;ll be tempted to &#8220;fiddle&#8221; with the trims a lot but in our case, we eventually got used to were they are and don&#8217;t mess with them all that much.  The next challenge is balancing out everyone&#8217;s levels with the overall headphone level.  If you want more of the vocalist and you&#8217;ve got their station&#8217;s knob maxed out, then you have to dial everyone else down, so you can turn your headphone up.  Again, if everyone is pretty consistent in their vocal or playing style, this is easy to dial in.  But if there&#8217;s a lot of variety, this can lead to more desire to tweak.  In a pure practice environment, none of this matters that much because you can always stop and tweak and then resume.  In a live environment though, you truly want to set it for a &#8220;happy medium&#8221; and then hope that works for the entire set.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s how we wanted to use the JamHub.  Our praise and worship band is a pretty conventional set up &#8212; electronic drums, bass player/singer, acoustic guitar player/singer, electric guitar (me) and a keyboard player/singer.  Obviously some of these guys also sing.  I do not.  Playing guitar consumes about 90% of my mental bandwidth so singing and playing isn&#8217;t going to happen in my lifetime.  Anyway, for years we&#8217;ve played through a 16 channel board with 2 sends for the mains and 2 sends for the monitors.  With that many instruments and vocals in a small space, trying to make everybody happy with only two monitor channels has been difficult at best.  Just ask our sound guy &#8212; I think when somebody&#8217;d ask for &#8220;more&#8221; he&#8217;d just hold his hand over the knob like he was adjusting it but wouldn&#8217;t really change anything because it was probably already maxed out anyway.  This lead to a loud monitor mix, which then muddied the sound in the house and nobody could ever really hear what they wanted to anyway.  We looked at upgrading to a professional &#8220;in ear&#8221; system, but none of us had won the lottery yet so that just wasn&#8217;t a practical option.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s when I found JamHub.  We ordered one of the first units, along with a couple extra headphone remotes and proceeded to completely rewire our stage and sound board connections.  The trick was to put some splitters between our instruments/mics and the JamHub so we could send the signals to both the JamHub and the sound board.  Here&#8217;s a picture of our setup:</p>
<p><img src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/jamhub-002.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>We run everything into an ART T8 and ART S8.  The outputs of those go into a short XLR snake to plug in where the output of everybody&#8217;s direct boxes would plug in.  We then used a bunch of insert cables to take the 1/4&#8243; outs to the instrument inputs on the JamHub.  The mics just used some short XLR patch cables.  The cool thing here is that the levels on the JamHub only affect monitoring &#8212; they don&#8217;t have any effect on the mains.  We&#8217;ve had some issues with 60hz hum due perhaps to the S8 not being fully isolated so there&#8217;s still some kinks to work out, and all the cabling doesn&#8217;t look as neat as it could, but it all works.  Everybody but one vocalist loves it and would never switch back.  The vocalist is a dedicated vocalist, so she just picks up the mains and the other vocalists around her because the stage volume is almost silent.</p>
<p>The drummer still complains that he can&#8217;t turn me completely down because there&#8217;s a main speaker not far from him, but otherwise, no complaints.  It takes a little creativity to run the headphones and we don&#8217;t move around a lot so that&#8217;s manageable.  We&#8217;ve gotten compliments that the mix sounds much better because there&#8217;s nothing from the monitors to muddy up house mix.  The sound guy can focus just on the mains because we control all the monitoring.  I can finally hear my guitar as loud as I want! This feels like an analog unit &#8212; you can get a fair amount of hiss if you don&#8217;t get the trim and gains set right.  If you&#8217;ve got everything dimed and then turn down the headphone volume, you&#8217;re going to get a lot of hiss.  Also, there&#8217;s no way to adjust the mix of a single station&#8217;s instrument/vocal mix.  It will be whatever that guy sets his trim at.</p>
<p>So, the JamHub guys will tell you it wasn&#8217;t designed for a permanent installation, and it&#8217;s not (as you can see from the rats nest of cables), but it can work and is very cost effective.  And it looks pretty cool&#8230;<br />
<img src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/jamhub-001.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>In summary, if you are thinking about going in ear and you have a limited budget, this is a great option. Make sure you consider how you&#8217;ll wire it in.  It needs to be centrally located and accessible to most everyone. Also, consider everyone&#8217;s mobility.  If you have a large stage and people are moving around a lot, this can still work, but you&#8217;re really going to want wireless for the in ear monitors.  That will drive the price up quite a bit.  Also, and this is really important &#8212; don&#8217;t cheap out on the headphones.  You&#8217;ll need something better than the $19 set of buds for an iPod from Walmart.  Think $60-75 at a minimum for a good set.  We spent about $1,000 on the JamHub, the splitters and additional cabling and now have a great in ear system that everbody loves.  It would have cost quite a bit more to do this with a &#8220;professional&#8221; system but this works great.  Maybe the JamHub guys will come out with a version that&#8217;s designed for a permanent installation that is rack ready and has the splitter function built in.  That&#8217;s about the only thing I can think of that would be nice to have with this system.</p>
<p>Our first unit had a &#8220;green light always on&#8221; issue but their customer service was great.  I gave them my CC #, they second day&#8217;d a replacement to me.  I swapped it out (took about 10 minutes), and dropped the broken one in the box back to them.  The whole process took maybe a week.  Sliced bread is still pretty cool, but this is a close second.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/02/10/jamhub-review-for-in-ear-monitoring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pod X3 Live Review, Two Years Later</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/01/24/pod-x3-live-review-two-years-later/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/01/24/pod-x3-live-review-two-years-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[6b8162e9-73be-48cb-8507-9f6e5a07fcb1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/Pod-X3-Live-Two-Years-Later.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I first got back into guitar 7-8 years ago, a friend recommended I check out GuitarPort from Line 6.  Since then, I&#8217;ve run through quite a few different products from them.  After getting hooked on modeling with the GuitarPort, I got a used Vetta that I used for playing out live.  Even though they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I first got back into guitar 7-8 years ago, a friend recommended I check out GuitarPort from Line 6.  Since then, I&#8217;ve run through quite a few different products from them.  After getting hooked on modeling with the GuitarPort, I got a used Vetta that I used for playing out live.  Even though they have not updated that in years, it is still a great modeling amp with an almost perfect feature set.  The down side was, well, it&#8217;s an amp and weighs a ton.  Somewhere during that early period I got a regular gig playing in the band at church and the thought of hauling the Vetta back and forth twice a week quickly wore on me.  So&#8230; I picked up the Pod XT Pro and stuck it in a portable rack case and used the same floor board that I used with the Vetta.  That wasn&#8217;t bad, but the tone options weren&#8217;t as good as with the Vetta.  Thus began a years long quest to find the Vetta options in an extremely portable package.</p>
<p>The Vetta and Pod XT Pro eventually went on eBay and I picked up a new Pod XT Live.  Finally &#8212; portability was at hand!  I also added a Variax 700 to my rig and with just two pieces of gear to haul, I could cover all the bases, from acoustic to Stratocaster and Les Paul sounds. That was my main rig until the Pod X3 came out a couple of years ago.  I sold the XT Live and switched to the X3 Live.  With dual tones, I finally had a lot of the options I missed from the Vetta without the back pains to go along with it.  What follows are my thoughts on two years of regular use of that combination.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><img src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/x3-live.jpg" alt="" width="668" height="443" /></p>
<p>First, here&#8217;s the things that I really like about it.  It&#8217;s extremely light.  The pedal is much more fluid than the XT&#8217;s pedal was.  It has built in S-PDIF out (that I use for recording) and stereo XLR outs.  It also has the ability to drive 1/4&#8243; outs at the same time and have the volume knob control only the 1/4&#8243; outs.  Why is that handy?  Because you can hook up your own monitor to hear yourself and control the volume from that independent of what you send to the board.  We play on a pretty crowded stage and with only 2 monitor channels and the inevitable &#8220;more me&#8221; from everybody, it got pretty loud.  Being able to drive a separate local floor wedge was a great solution.  At least for me it was <img src='http://keenesoftware.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />   Another obvious plus is you can control the Variax with the patches, so switching from acoustic to electric is as easy as changing patches. Definitely a cool option.  Another plus (and a huge minus) is that the dual tones are completely separate.  If you have a guitar with a piezo output, you can route both cables to the X3 and get some of the same Variax style flexiblity &#8212; switching between acoustic and electric (and controlling which of the two 1/4&#8243; inputs the tones use) &#8212; at the stomp of the foot.</p>
<p>So, what&#8217;s not to like?  Well, the X3 was anticipated as the &#8220;Vetta on the floor&#8221; solution.  Unfortunately, if you want to do more than run a single amp model and limited effect options, it&#8217;s not.  The Vetta still blows away the X3 in terms of routing flexibility.  The Vetta is more like a 2 amps at once feature rather than dual tone.  With the Vetta, you can stick an overdrive in front of the signal chain and when it&#8217;s on, it drives both amps.  You can do the same thing with the the X3, but you have to keep them in sync on both tones and to turn the stomp on or off, you have to hit a button to toggle the stomp, then hit a button to switch to the other tone, and hit the stomp button again.  Repeat the process to toggle the effect.  The other option is burn another patch &#8212; one with the stomp on and another with the stomp off.  So now 128 patch slots doesn&#8217;t look so good.  This same issue affects the mod and delay settings.  The only way to turn an effect on or off globally is to switch to the patch that has it set the way you want.  Now when you&#8217;re tweaking, even if you&#8217;re using GearBox, migrating amp effects or stomp effects between patches is a real nightmare. The other killer here is delay tails.  When you switch patches because you want to turn off delay on both tones, the delay tails stop.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also had a few hardware issues with mine.  The main knobs have a &#8220;wiggle&#8221; sensitivity problem. Vibration or who knows what makes the X3 think you&#8217;ve changed a knob and so all of a sudden drive will go to wherever the knob is set.  You can park the knobs at 0 or 10 to minimize the issue but still &#8212; it&#8217;s a pain.  The other problem was the super-cheap S-PDIF connector they used.  If you apply any pressure what-so-ever when hooking up, it will eventually break one of the solder legs that connects the jack to the circuit board.  A little solder fixes the problem, but again, not something you should have to do with normal use. And here&#8217;s the real problem &#8212; it&#8217;s plastic.  Plastic attracts dust like crazy. My XT never caught the amount of dust my X3 gets.  And as you can see from the picture, I&#8217;m not a fan of dusting.</p>
<p>Now there are solutions for all of this.  When the the X3 came out, there was no MIDI support.  With a software upgrade, they added full MIDI support so you could program a MIDI board to toggle the stomps with a single button press.  But then you&#8217;re back to carrying something extra around, which defeats the purpose.  You could at a Line 6 M13 and use the famed &#8220;four cable method&#8221; to get some of the Vetta flexibility, but again, it&#8217;s another box, to hook it up right you&#8217;d lose some of the Variax flexibility and you also lose the stereo separation because of M13 and FX loop limitations. And of course, I could dust more&#8230;</p>
<p>So there you have it.  Two plus years later, I still use the X3.  Mostly because I haven&#8217;t found anything else in the price range that comes close to the options I want.  But that doesn&#8217;t stop me from wishing that the X4 will be the Vetta on the floor we were all hoping the X3 would be.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2010/01/24/pod-x3-live-review-two-years-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Move Vista&#8217;s Users folder to a Different Drive</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2009/05/10/move-vistas-users-folder-to-a-different-drive/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2009/05/10/move-vistas-users-folder-to-a-different-drive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[16790fd9-cfee-4e70-830a-47f709d0f72a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/Move-Vistas-Users-folder-to-a-Different-Drive.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, so I&#8217;ve finally gotten around to setting up a Vista machine as my main machine.  I opted to go with an SSD drive for the system drive and planned on putting all the user data on a different drive.  After doing a little research, the best solution to accomplish this with the least amount [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so I&#8217;ve finally gotten around to setting up a Vista machine as my main machine.  I opted to go with an SSD drive for the system drive and planned on putting all the user data on a different drive.  After doing a little research, the best solution to accomplish this with the least amount of hastle (or so I thought) would be to copy the content of Users to the new drive and set up a junction (symbolic link) to the new location.  Well, that was certainly easier said than done.  Everything I read suggested to do all the copying and sym-linking from the command prompt from the Vista setup disk because the Users directory is in use once Vista is running.  The problem with doing that turned out that the drive letter assigned to the new home for Users wasn&#8217;t the same during setup as when running Vista.  After multiple attempts to get the setup instance of Vista to use the same drive letters as the running instance, including re-installing Vista after failed attempts rendered the Users folder unusable, I decided there had to be a better way.</p>
<p>During my initial research, I found mention of people using MOUNTVOL instead of MKLINK.  The main difference is that MOUNTVOL makes the entire disk volume available at the mounted location rather than just a directory.  Depending on your application, that may be too restrictive.  But for my application, that was fine as that&#8217;s what I wanted to do anyway.  And the huge benefit of using MOUNTVOL is that the pointer is to a physical drive, not a logical drive letter.  After installing and booting to the setup CMD shell, renaming the Users directory to something else, I created an empty directory and mounted the drive on it.  I then used ROBOCOPY to copy the Users directory content back to Users, thus restoring and preserving the settings and security attributes.</p>
<p>So, here&#8217;s my recipe:</p>
<blockquote><p>Install Vista (if you haven&#8217;t already)<br />
Boot to the setup CD and once the installer is running press Shift+F10 to get to the shell</p></blockquote>
<p>Then, on the boot drive:</p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'courier new', courier;"><span style="font-size: small;">ren Users Users_save<br />
mountvol </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: x-small;">(Note: no parameters on the <span style="font-family: 'courier new', courier;">mountvol</span> command to get the volume label of the disk you want to use.  Then use the shell&#8217;s clipboard feature to copy the volume label to the clipboard.)<br />
</span><span style="font-family: 'courier new', courier;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
mountvol \Users <em>&lt;paste the volume label here&gt;</em><br />
robocopy \Users_save \Users /MIR /E /XJ</span> </span></p>
<p>Reboot and enjoy.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2009/05/10/move-vistas-users-folder-to-a-different-drive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All about Moonlighting</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2008/10/25/all-about-moonlighting/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2008/10/25/all-about-moonlighting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[375b08f1-1d7f-449d-b5a9-6dcf3cf6abcd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photographic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lighting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/All-about-Moonlighting.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Moonlighting (also called tree lighting) is a technique where the light is placed near the top of the tree and shines down.  It&#8217;s great for getting some soft general area illumination without the glaring effect of flood lighting.  It is best done in trees that are at least 20 to 30 feet tall and in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moonlighting (also called tree lighting) is a technique where the light is placed near the top of the tree and shines down.  It&#8217;s great for getting some soft general area illumination without the glaring effect of flood lighting.  It is best done in trees that are at least 20 to 30 feet tall and in trees that keep their leaves year round.  Here in Dallas, the best type of tree to do this in is the Live Oak but it can also be done in any large tree, including Red Oaks, Burr Oaks and Pecans and Elms.</p>
<p>The picture below is of a Burr Oak in a back yard.  It&#8217;s common in the Dallas area to do this type of lighting using a type of bulb called mercury vapor.  It creates a blueish green type of light that is soft and creates similar patterns on the ground.  However, the Energy Act of 2005 stopped the manufacture and import of mercury vapor ballasts (electronics required to ignite the mercury vapor bulbs) starting in January of 2008.  There are alternatives but they all use a fair amount of electricity (typical mercury vapor bulbs are 100 watts).</p>
<p><img style="width: 682px; height: 397px;" src="http://keenesoftware.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/moon-lighting-004.jpg" alt="" width="682" height="397" /></p>
<p>This tree was lit using a ceramic metal halide bulb (CMH) from Outdoor Lighting Perspectives (<a href="http://www.outdoorlights.com/">www.outdoorlights.com</a>).  It&#8217;s only 39 watts and puts out more lumens than a 100 watt mercury vapor bulb.  It also produces a soft white color light so the landscape elements are illuminated in their more natural color, rather than the blue/green tint from mercury vapor.  All in all, a pretty cool effect!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2008/10/25/all-about-moonlighting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New version and new theme</title>
		<link>http://keenesoftware.com/2008/08/30/new-version-and-new-theme/</link>
		<comments>http://keenesoftware.com/2008/08/30/new-version-and-new-theme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ecb807e3-8744-465a-8d03-1148a88a875a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/post/New-version-and-new-theme.aspx</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been using the latest version of BlogEngine.Net and in the process of upgrading to Visual Studio 2008, I reorganized the solution for the whole site.  It&#8217;s now simpler to maintain and I&#8217;m now on a near-pristine copy of BlogEngine.Net which will make picking up future updates quite a bit easier.  As is usually the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using the latest version of BlogEngine.Net and in the process of upgrading to Visual Studio 2008, I reorganized the solution for the whole site.  It&#8217;s now simpler to maintain and I&#8217;m now on a near-pristine copy of BlogEngine.Net which will make picking up future updates quite a bit easier.  As is usually the case with software, it&#8217;s much faster and simpler to implement something the second time around, especially when you don&#8217;t worry about maintaining any old data.  So, the old posts and comments are gone.</p>
<p>One interesting problem of note that I ran into while doing this was the blog main page would not load, complaining about not being able to find the Standard theme.  Everything worked fine on my development system but would not work when published out to GoDaddy.  Turns out that when it is running on IIS, the theme of the parent site (in this case,  <a href="/">www.keenesoftware.com</a>) was defaulting onto the blog&#8217;s site (<a href="/blog">www.keenesoftware.com/blog</a>).  The fix is to add a <span style="font-family: 'courier new', courier; font-size: x-small;">theme=&#8221;"</span> attribute on the <span style="font-family: 'courier new', courier; font-size: x-small;">&lt;pages&gt;</span> tag in the blog app&#8217;s web.config file.  Since BlogEngine.Net does it&#8217;s own theme handling, I would think this would be the default but it&#8217;s not. If you run into this issue while trying to add BlogEngine.Net to your own site as a virtual directory, this should fix it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to keep this blog a bit more persistent going forward so comment away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://keenesoftware.com/2008/08/30/new-version-and-new-theme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
